2 years ago
29th Sunday 2012
A popular exercise among High School creative writing teachers in America is to ask students to imagine they have been transformed, for a day, into someone of the opposite sex, and describe what that day might be like. The results, apparently, are uncannily uniform. The girls all write long and detailed essays that clearly show they have spent a great deal of time thinking about the subject. Half of the boys usually refuse to write the essay entirely. Those who do make it clear they have not the slightest conception what being a teenage girl might be like, and deeply resent having to think about it.

David Graeber, “Beyond Power/Knowledge: An Exploration of Power, Ignorance and Stupidity” (pdf)

He also says much the same thing in “Revolutions in Reverse,” an essay included in the book Revolutions in Reverse (which can be read in Scribd at the link). I’d been meaning to post a quote from the second source for a while, thanks to Aaron Brady for the actual excerpt above. That last link is a good essay on the recent Rush Limbaugh BS and how patriarchy works and how male privilege is defended by having men like Limbaugh around to keep women’s opinions out of the allowed discourse on the subject. To keep high school boys forever unable to write essays that could relate to the issue of needing hormonal birth control to control ovarian cysts.

(via youthisastateofmind)

We talked about this a lot this year in English. Girls are taught from a young age that we have to connect to what we read, so when we do excercises in class, everyone talks about how they connect to Huck Finn, or to Jay Gatsby, or to Julius Caesar. We connect to all the characters because we have to, because if we don’t then we won’t survive through the years of school.

Boys don’t deal with this. Practically every book or story they encounter from the time they begin school is full of male characters and written by men. So when confronted with female characters of female authors, they don’t know what to do. They feel as if they can’t connect with these characters because of the gender boundaries. As one woman in my class pointed out, “girls have to connect to male characters, but boys don’t have to connect to female characters.” By the time they’re my age, it’s not even intentional: many honestly think that they won’t understand a female character because they have no shared experiences whatsoever.

(via animehrmine)

reblogged from iamtheliquorr // source: youthisastateofmind
with 3,167 notes
  1. littlewiggy reblogged this from ladyzanzibar
  2. lavendersmack reblogged this from medvalkyrie
  3. medvalkyrie reblogged this from valeria2067
  4. wily-caryatid reblogged this from bigfatfeminist
  5. tribblemaker reblogged this from estelendur
  6. estelendur reblogged this from youthisastateofmind
  7. somethingunholy reblogged this from chantthebeautyofthegood
  8. chantthebeautyofthegood reblogged this from cassassybitch
  9. chalkdustmemory reblogged this from cassassybitch
  10. cassassybitch reblogged this from iknowyouwillbehappyhere
  11. ensnacka reblogged this from feministquotes
  12. schmenny reblogged this from awesomepudding
  13. awesomepudding reblogged this from monanotlisa
  14. propertyofsir reblogged this from catherinetheless
  15. backtospaininarowboat reblogged this from greenwolfkate
  16. greenwolfkate reblogged this from moneypennyhenry
  17. moneypennyhenry reblogged this from dainochild
  18. pukingpenguins reblogged this from pikachurinn
  19. pikachurinn reblogged this from dainochild
  20. cinderquill reblogged this from dainochild